College Football Rankings 2012 FBS After Week 12 of Play by SportPundit Using YPPSYS, the Yards Per Play System
Teams below are color-coded by conference -- the selected color was random.
The color-coding of the rankings shows quickly that teams from the same conference tend to "clump" together, thus making the general strength (or weakness) of the conference more visible.
These ratings and rankings AFTER the TWELFTH week of play are based on the primary measure of "net average yards per play advantage" (NAYPPA), a specific predictive calculation which we were the first to implement, minus a calculation of the schedule difficulty. Starting about mid-season, ours is not an ordinal ranking of schedule difficulty by 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. but is rather based on the average rank of the teams played. We also apply adjustments early in the season because not enough games have been played and such stats are skewed, leading to poor predictions. The inclusion of FCS teams in scheduling makes calculation of the strength of schedule more difficult and at best the strength of such FCS teams vis-a-vis FBS teams is an approximation. We use Sagarin USA Today and Massey Ratings for assistance in calculating the strength of FCS teams for purposes of calculating schedule difficulty, which is not an exact science by any means, but only an estimate.
As a measuring stick, note that the best college teams of all time had a NAYPPA of not greater than 3.0 for an entire season. Schedules have become easier recently, e.g. through FCS scheduling, and Boise State had a 3.5 season NAYPPA two years ago but lost a game.
See Best Teams Ever: (top three as examples below)
- 3.0 NAYPPA - 6.6 yards per play on offense to 3.6 yards per play on defense = USC Trojans 2008 season
- 2.8 NAYPPA - 6.2 yards per play on offense to 3.4 yards per play on defense (stats) = Oklahoma Sooners 1974 season
- 2.7 NAYPPA- 7.2 yards per play on offense to 4.5 yards per play on defense = Nebraska Cornhuskers 1995 season
We get the yards-per-play stats that we use from the college or university online football websites that are linked below under "yards per play offense" or from cfbstats.com, a website with loads of college football statistics.
THE YPPSYS TEAM RANKINGS AND RATINGS AFTER WEEK 12 OF PLAY
| 2012 Sport Pundit Rank | AFTER WEEK TWELVE (12) TEAM FBS color-coded by conference |
NAYPPA
net average yards per play advantage offense over defense
| yards per play offense | yards per play defense | Schedule difficulty as opponent average rank plus or minus subjective adjustments (this is our calculation based on various sources including our own rankings) | W-L record 2012 | YPPSYS Team Rating NAYPPA minus .01 x 2 x schedule difficulty minus .2 for every loss. *=adjusted | |||||||
| 1 |
Alabama
| 3.0 | 6.9 | 3.9 | 55 | 10-1 | +1.7 | |||||||
| 2 | Notre Dame | 1.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 55 | 11-0 | +0.4 | |||||||
| 3 | Oregon | 1.7 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 55 | 10-1 | +0.4 | |||||||
| 4 | Georgia | 2.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 70 | 10-1 | +0.4 | |||||||
| 5 | LSU | 1.4 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 45 | 9-2 | +0.3 | |||||||
| 6 | Ohio State | 1.1 | 6.1 | 5.0 | 40* | 11-0 | +0.3 | |||||||
| 7 | Texas A&M | 1.7 | 6.9 | 5.2 |
50
|
8-2
|
+0.3
| |||||||
| 8 | Nebraska | 1.8 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 55 | 9-2 | +0.3 | |||||||
| 9 | Stanford | 1.0 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 15* | 9-2 | +0.3 | |||||||
| 10 | Florida | 1.0 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 40 | 10-1 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 11 | South Carolina |
1.0
| 5.6 | 4.6 | 30* | 9-2 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 12 | Kansas State | 1.2 | 6.5 | 5.3 | 50 | 10-1 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 13 | Oklahoma | 1.5 | 6.8 | 5.3 | 55* | 8-2 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 14 | Michigan | 1.7 | 6.3 | 4.6 | 55 | 8-3 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 15 | Oregon State | 0.9 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 25 | 8-2 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 16 | UCLA | 0.6 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 10* | 9-2 | 0.0 | |||||||
| 17 | USC | 1.7 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 50* | 7-4 | -0.1 | |||||||
| 18 | Florida State | 3.6 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 175* | 10-1 | -0.1 | |||||||
| 19 | Texas | 0.5 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 25* | 8-2 | -0.4 | |||||||
| 20 | Michigan State | 0.4 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 0* | 5-6 | -0.8 | |||||||
| 21 | Wisconsin |
1.1
| 5.7 |
4.6
|
55
|
7-4
|
-0.8
| |||||||
| 22 | Arizona | 0.4 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 20* |
7-4
| -0.8 | |||||||
| 23 | Utah State |
2.3
| 6.8 |
4.5
|
135*
|
9-2
|
-0.8
| |||||||
| 24 | San Jose St. | 1.3 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 90 | 9-2 |
-0.9
| |||||||
| 25 | Boise State | 1.5 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 100 | 9-2 | -0.9 | |||||||
| 26 | Oklahoma State | 2.1 | 7.2 | 5.1 | 120* | 7-3 | -0.9 | |||||||
| 27 | Baylor |
1.0
| 7.0 |
6.0
|
50
|
5-5
|
-1.0
| |||||||
| 28 | Texas Tech | 1.2 | 6.4 | 5.2 | 70* | 7-4 | -1.0 | |||||||
| 29 | Penn State | 0.6 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 40* | 7-4 | -1.0 | |||||||
| 30 | Northwestern | 0.1 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 25* | 8-3 | -1.0 | |||||||
| 31 | Washington | -0.3 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 0* | 7-4 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 32 | Clemson | 0.7 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 80 | 10-1 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 33 | BYU | 0.7 | 5.2 | 4.5 | 40* | 6-5 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 34 | Arizona State |
1.0
| 5.7 |
4.7
| 55 | 6-5 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 35 | Mississippi State |
0.6
| 6.0 |
5.4
|
55
|
8-3
|
-1.1
| |||||||
| 36 | Vanderbilt | 0.9 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 60 | 7-4 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 37 | Northern Illinois | 2.1 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 150* | 10-1 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 38 | Louisville | 1.0 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 95 | 9-1 | -1.1 | |||||||
| 39 | Rutgers | 0.8 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 90 | 9-1 | -1.2 | |||||||
| 40 | Cincinnati | 1.2 | 6.5 | 5.3 | 90 | 7-3 | -1.2 | |||||||
| 41 | TCU | 0.5 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 50* | 6-4 | -1.3 | |||||||
| 42 | West Virginia | -0.2 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 5* | 5-5 | -1.3 | |||||||
| 43 | North Carolina | 1.3 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 90 | 7-4 | -1.3 | |||||||
| 44 | Fresno State | 1.5 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 110 | 8-3 | -1.3 | |||||||
| 45 | Iowa State | -0.5 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 0* | 6-5 | -1.5 | |||||||
| 46 | San Diego State | 0.5 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 70 | 8-3 | -1.5 | |||||||
| 47 | Syracuse | 0.3 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 40* | 6-5 | -1.5 | |||||||
| 48 | Arkansas State | 1.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 95 | 8-3 | -1.5 | |||||||
| 49 | Louis.-Monroe |
0.2
| 6.0 |
5.8
|
50*
|
7-4
|
-1.6
| |||||||
| 50 | Tulsa | 0.7 | 5.6 | 4.9 | 95 | 9-2 | -1.6 | |||||||
| 51 | UCF | 1.1 | 6.0 | 4.9 | 105 | 8-3 | -1.6 | |||||||
| 52 | Mississippi | 0.3 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 35 | 5-6 | -1.6 | |||||||
| 53 | California | 0.1 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 10* | 3-8 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 54 | Missouri | -0.5 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 0* | 5-6 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 55 | Arkansas | 0.3 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 30* | 4-7 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 56 | Minnesota | 0.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 35* | 6-5 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 57 | Pittsburgh | 0.9 | 6.2 | 5.3 | 70 | 4-6 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 58 | Mid. Tennessee | 0.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 60* | 7-3 | -1.8 | |||||||
| 59 | Miami (Florida) | 0.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 45* | 6-5 | -1.8 | |||||||
| 60 | Virginia Tech | 0.5 | 5.7 | 5.2 | 55* | 5-6 | -1.8 | |||||||
| 61 | Georgia Tech | 0.9 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 85 | 6-5 |
-1.8
| |||||||
| 62 | Louis.-Lafayette | 0.9 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 95* | 6-4 | -1.8 | |||||||
| 63 | Auburn | -0.5 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 0* | 3-7 | -1.9 | |||||||
| 64 | Kent State | 0.1 | 6.0 |
5.9
| 90 | 10-1 | -1.9 | |||||||
| 65 | West. Kentucky | 0.7 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 80* | 6-5 | -1.9 | |||||||
| 66 | Utah | -0.6 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 0* | 4-7 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 67 | Louisiana Tech | 0.2 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 90 | 9-2 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 68 | Navy | 0.1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 65* | 7-4 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 69 | N.C. State | -0.5 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 25* | 6-5 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 70 | Tennessee | 0.1 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 35 | 4-7 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 71 | Nevada | 0.4 | 6.2 | 5.8 | 85 | 7-4 | -2.1 | |||||||
| 72 | Ball State | -0.5 | 5.9 | 6.4 | 50* | 8-3 | -2.1 | |||||||
| 73 | Toledo | -0.4 | 6.1 | 6.5 | 65* | 8-3 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 74 | Indiana | -0.3 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 30* | 4-7 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 75 | Purdue | -0.3 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 40* | 5-6 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 76 | Air Force | 0.4 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 85 | 6-5 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 77 | Bowling Green | 0.8 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 115* | 7-4 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 78 | Ohio | 0.4 | 5.8 | 5.4 |
105*
|
8-3
|
-2.3
| |||||||
| 79 | Iowa |
-0.9
| 4.8 | 5.7 | 5* | 4-7 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 80 | Virginia | 0.1 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 55* | 4-7 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 81 | Kentucky | -0.6 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 0* | 2-9 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 82 | Marshall | 0.2 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 70 | 5-6 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 83 | Temple | -1.1 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 5* | 4-6 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 84 | South Florida | -0.3 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 35* | 3-7 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 85 | Connecticut | 0.3 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 75 | 4-6 | -2.4 | |||||||
| 86 | East Carolina | -0.2 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 75* | 7-4 | -2.5 | |||||||
| 87 | Maryland | -0.5 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 50 | 4-7 | -2.9 | |||||||
| 88 | Duke | -1.0 | 5.2 | 6.2 | 45* | 6-5 | -2.9 | |||||||
| 89 | Troy | -0.1 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 80 | 5-6 | -2.9 | |||||||
| 90 | Buffalo | 0.1 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 80 | 4-7 | -2.9 | |||||||
| 91 | Cent. Michigan | 0.1 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 75* | 5-6 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 92 | East. Michigan | -1.3 | 5.4 | 6.7 | 0* | 2-9 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 93 | West. Michigan | 0.2 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 80 | 4-8 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 94 | Washington St. | -0.9 | 4.9 | 5.8 | 15* | 2-9 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 95 | Houston | 0.0 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 80* | 4-7 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 96 | Rice | -1.0 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 45* | 5-6 | -3.1 | |||||||
| 97 | North Texas | -0.5 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 60* | 4-7 | -3.1 | |||||||
| 98 | SMU | -0.2 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 85 | 5-6 | -3.1 | |||||||
| 99 | Illinois | -1.4 | 4.4 | 5.8 | 0* | 2-9 | -3.2 | |||||||
| 100 | Wyoming | -0.6 | 5.5 | 6.1 | 60* | 4-7 | -3.2 | |||||||
| 101 | Texas State | -0.8 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 70 | 3-7 | -3.4 | |||||||
| 102 | Wake Forest | -1.3 | 4.4 | 5.7 | 50* | 5-6 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 103 | Boston College | -0.5 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 60 | 2-9 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 104 | Miami (Ohio) | -0.9 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 60* | 4-7 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 105 | New Mexico | -1.2 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 35* | 4-8 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 106 | Colorado State | -0.2 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 85 | 3-8 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 107 | UNLV | -0.8 | 5.4 | 6.2 | 35* | 2-10 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 108 | Florida Int'l FIU | -0.4 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 75 | 3-8 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 109 | Kansas | -1.6 | 5.0 | 6.6 | 0* | 1-10 | -3.6 | |||||||
| 110 | Memphis | -0.6 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 80 | 3-8 | -3.8 | |||||||
| 111 | UTSA | -0.5 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 130 | 7-4 | -3.9 | |||||||
| 112 | UTEP | -1.0 | 5.2 | 6.2 | 65 | 3-8 | -3.9 | |||||||
| 113 | Tulane | -1.6 | 4.7 | 6.3 | 30* | 2-9 | -4.0 | |||||||
| 114 | UAB |
-0.5
| 5.5 |
6.0
|
95
|
3-8
|
-4.0
| |||||||
| 115 | South Alabama | -0.7 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 75 | 2-9 | -4.0 | |||||||
| 116 | Army | -1.2 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 70* | 2-9 | -4.4 | |||||||
| 117 | Florida Atlantic | -1.3 | 4.8 | 6.1 | 75 | 3-8 | -4.4 | |||||||
| 118 | Colorado | -2.9 | 4.3 | 7.2 | 0* | 1-10 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 119 | Massachusetts | -2.6 | 3.9 | 6.5 | 0* | 1-10 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 120 | Akron | -0.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 105 | 1-10 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 121 | Southern Miss | -1.1 | 4.9 | 6.0 | 70 | 0-11 | -4.7 | |||||||
| 122 | Hawaii | -1.8 | 4.1 | 5.9 | 60 | 1-9 | -4.8 | |||||||
| 123 | Idaho | -1.8 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 50* | 1-10 | -4.8 | |||||||
| 124 | New Mexico St. | -1.5 | 5.1 | 6.6 |
85
|
1-9
| -5.0 |

No comments:
Post a Comment