Final College Football Rankings and Ratings 2012-2013 FBS Post-Bowl by SportPundit & YPPSYS, Yards Per Play System
Six SEC teams are in the top 10. That pretty much sums up this season.
Teams below are color-coded by conference -- the selected color was random.
The color-coding of the rankings shows quickly that teams from the same conference tend to "clump" together, thus making the relative general strength (or weakness) of any conference more visible.
These are the season-ending post-bowl ratings and rankings based on our primary measure of "net average yards per play advantage" (NAYPPA), a specific predictive calculation which we were the first to implement, minus a calculation of the schedule difficulty. The inclusion of FCS teams in scheduling makes calculation of the strength of schedule difficult and the strength of FCS teams is an approximation. Sagarin USA Today schedule difficulty ratings are used to assist in calculating schedule difficulty here, but we add some subjective judgments and a special formula to handle schedule difficulty, whereby for this final ranking and rating we subtract from the NAYPPA 2 x the schedule difficulty up to 50 and 3 x the schedule difficulty for 55 and up minus .2 for every loss. It is still a bit unwieldy and we hope to improve this system next year.
As a measuring stick, note that the best college teams of all time had a NAYPPA of not greater than 3.0 for an entire season. Schedules have become easier recently, e.g. through FCS scheduling, and Boise State had a 3.5 season NAYPPA two years ago but lost a game. According to this yards-per-play standard, this year's Alabama team would be ranked among the best teams ever, had they not lost to Texas A&M.
See Best Teams Ever: (top three as examples below)
- 3.0 NAYPPA - 6.6 yards per play on offense to 3.6 yards per play on defense = USC Trojans 2008 season
- 2.8 NAYPPA - 6.2 yards per play on offense to 3.4 yards per play on defense (stats) = Oklahoma Sooners 1974 season
- 2.7 NAYPPA- 7.2 yards per play on offense to 4.5 yards per play on defense = Nebraska Cornhuskers 1995 season
We get the yards-per-play stats that we use from the college or university online football websites that are linked below under "yards per play offense" or from cfbstats.com, a website with loads of college football statistics.
THE 2012-2013 Post-Bowl SportPundit & YPPSYS TEAM RANKINGS AND RATINGS
| 2012 -2013 Sport Pundit Rank | AFTER The Bowl Games TEAM FBS color-coded by conference |
NAYPPA
net average yards per play advantage offense over defense
| yards per play offense | yards per play defense | Schedule difficulty plus or minus subjective adjustments* (this is our calculation based on various sources including our own rankings) | W-L record 2012 -2013 incl. bowl games | YPPSYS Team Rating NAYPPA minus .01 x 2x schedule difficulty up to 50 minus 3x schedule difficulty thereafter minus .2 for every loss. | |||||||
| 1 |
Alabama
| 2.8 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 50 | 13-1 | +1.6 | |||||||
| 2 | Oregon | 1.7 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 50 | 12-1 | +0.5 | |||||||
| 3 | Texas A&M | 1.9 | 7.1 | 5.2 |
50
|
11-2
|
+0.5
| |||||||
| 4 | Georgia | 1.9 | 7.1 | 5.2 | 50 | 12-2 | +0.5 | |||||||
| 5 | Notre Dame | 1.2 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 50 | 12-1 | +0.0 | |||||||
| 6 | Ohio State | 1.0 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 50 | 12-0 | +0.0 | |||||||
| 7 | South Carolina |
1.1
| 5.7 | 4.6 | 50 | 11-2 | -0.3 | |||||||
| 8 | Florida | 0.9 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 50 | 11-2 | -0.5 | |||||||
| 9 | Stanford | 0.8 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 50 | 12-2 | -0.6 | |||||||
| 10 | LSU | 1.0 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 50 | 10-3 | -0.6 | |||||||
| 11 | Florida State | 3.1 | 7.0 | 3.9 | 110 | 12-2 | -0.6 | |||||||
| 12 | Kansas State | 0.8 | 6.2 | 5.4 | 50 | 11-2 | -0.6 | |||||||
| 13 | Clemson | 0.6 | 6.3 | 5.7 | 50 | 11-2 | -0.8 | |||||||
| 14 | Nebraska | 1.0 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 50 | 10-4 | -0.8 | |||||||
| 15 | Michigan | 1.2 | 6.1 | 4.9 | 50 | 8-5 | -0.8 | |||||||
| 16 | Oklahoma | 0.7 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 50 | 10-3 | -0.9 | |||||||
| 17 | USC | 1.3 | 6.6 | 5.3 | 50 | 7-6 | -0.9 | |||||||
| 18 | Oregon State | 0.8 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 50 | 9-4 | -1.0 | |||||||
| 19 | Wisconsin |
1.2
| 6.0 |
4.8
|
50
|
8-6
|
-1.0
| |||||||
| 20 | Baylor |
0.9
| 6.9 |
6.0
|
50
|
8-5
|
-1.1
| |||||||
| 21 | Utah State |
2.5
| 6.8 |
4.3
|
110
|
11-2
|
-1.2
| |||||||
| 22 | Texas | 0.4 | 6.3 | 5.9 | 50 | 9-4 | -1.4 | |||||||
| 23 | Northwestern | 0.1 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 50 | 10-3 | -1.5 | |||||||
| 24 | San Jose St. | 1.3 | 6.4 | 5.1 | 80 | 11-2 |
-1.5
| |||||||
| 25 | UCLA | 0.4 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 50 | 9-5 | -1.6 | |||||||
| 26 | Boise State | 1.2 | 5.8 | 4.6 | 80 | 11-2 | -1.6 | |||||||
| 27 | Vanderbilt | 0.9 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 60 | 9-4 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 28 | Arizona State |
1.2
| 6.0 |
4.8
| 65 | 8-5 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 29 | Arizona | 0.3 | 6.3 | 6.0 | 50 |
8-5
| -1.7 | |||||||
| 30 | Oklahoma State | 1.7 | 7.0 | 5.3 | 80 | 8-5 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 31 | Texas Tech | 1.1 | 6.5 | 5.4 | 60 | 8-5 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 32 | Syracuse | 0.3 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 50 | 8-5 | -1.7 | |||||||
| 33 | Mississippi | 0.4 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 50 | 7-6 | -1.8 | |||||||
| 34 | Louisville | 0.6 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 70 | 11-2 | -1.9 | |||||||
| 35 | BYU | 0.8 | 5.2 | 4.4 | 60 | 8-5 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 36 | Cincinnati | 1.3 | 6.6 | 5.3 | 90 | 10-3 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 37 | Louisiana Tech | 0.1 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 55 | 9-3 | -2.0 | |||||||
| 38 | Penn State | 0.5 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 60 | 8-4 | -2.1 | |||||||
| 39 | Michigan State | 0.7 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 55 | 7-6 | -2.1 | |||||||
| 40 | TCU | 0.6 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 60 | 7-6 | -2.1 | |||||||
| 41 | West Virginia | 0.2 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 55 | 7-6 | -2.1 | |||||||
| 42 | Mississippi St. |
0.4
| 5.9 |
5.5
|
55
|
8-5
|
-2.2
| |||||||
| 43 | Arkansas | 0.4 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 50 | 4-8 | -2.2 | |||||||
| 44 | North Carolina | 1.3 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 90 | 8-4 | -2.2 | |||||||
| 45 | Pittsburgh | 0.8 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 55 | 6-7 | -2.2 | |||||||
| 46 | Miami (Florida) | 0.4 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 55 | 7-5 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 47 | Virginia Tech | 0.4 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 55 | 7-6 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 48 | Georgia Tech | 0.5 | 6.2 | 5.7 | 55 | 7-7 |
-2.3
| |||||||
| 49 | North. Illinois | 1.7 | 6.4 | 4.7 | 120 | 12-2 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 50 | Rutgers | 0.6 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 70 | 9-4 | -2.3 | |||||||
| 51 | Washington | -0.3 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 50 | 7-6 | -2.5 | |||||||
| 52 | Arkansas State | 1.0 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 100 | 10-3 | -2.6 | |||||||
| 53 | Fresno State | 1.5 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 110 | 9-4 | -2.6 | |||||||
| 54 | San Diego State | 0.6 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 80 | 9-4 | -2.6 | |||||||
| 55 | Missouri | -0.6 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 35 | 5-7 | -2.7 | |||||||
| 56 | Tennessee | 0.3 | 6.4 | 6.1 | 60 | 5-7 | -2.7 | |||||||
| 57 | Tulsa | 0.6 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 90 | 11-3 | -2.7 | |||||||
| 58 | California | 0.1 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 50 | 3-9 | -2.7 | |||||||
| 59 | Minnesota | -0.4 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 50 | 6-7 | -2.8 | |||||||
| 60 | Utah | -0.4 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 50 | 5-7 | -2.8 | |||||||
| 61 | UCF | 1.0 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 100 | 10-4 | -2.8 | |||||||
| 62 | Kent State | 0.2 | 5.8 |
5.6
| 80 | 11-3 | -2.8 | |||||||
| 63 | Louis.-Lafayette | 0.9 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 100 | 9-4 | -2.9 | |||||||
| 64 | Navy | 0.1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 70 | 8-5 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 65 | Iowa State | -0.6 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 50 | 6-7 | -3.0 | |||||||
| 66 | Louis.-Monroe |
-0.2
| 5.7 |
5.9
|
60
|
8-5
|
-3.0
| |||||||
| 67 | Virginia | 0.2 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 55 | 4-8 | -3.1 | |||||||
| 68 | Connecticut | 0.3 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 70 | 5-7 | -3.2 | |||||||
| 69 | West. Kentucky | 0.7 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 90 | 7-6 | -3.2 | |||||||
| 70 | N.C. State | -0.3 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 60 | 7-6 | -3.3 | |||||||
| 71 | Mid. Tennessee | -0.3 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 75 | 8-4 | -3.3 | |||||||
| 72 | Ball State | -0.6 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 65 | 9-4 | -3.4 | |||||||
| 73 | Auburn | -0.7 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 50 | 3-9 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 74 | Toledo | -0.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 75 | 9-4 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 75 | Purdue | -0.2 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 65 | 6-7 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 76 | Air Force | 0.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 70 | 6-7 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 77 | Nevada | 0.3 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 85 | 7-6 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 78 | Bowling Green | 0.6 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 105 | 8-5 | -3.5 | |||||||
| 79 | Ohio | 0.4 | 5.8 | 5.4 |
105
|
9-4
|
-3.5
| |||||||
| 80 | Duke | -1.2 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 50 | 6-7 | -3.6 | |||||||
| 81 | Indiana | -0.4 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 55 | 4-8 | -3.6 | |||||||
| 82 | Iowa |
-0.8
| 4.7 | 5.5 | 50 | 4-8 | -3.6 | |||||||
| 83 | Washington St. | -0.8 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 50 | 3-9 | -3.6 | |||||||
| 84 | Kentucky | -0.7 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 50 | 2-10 | -3.7 | |||||||
| 85 | SMU | -0.2 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 75 | 7-6 | -3.7 | |||||||
| 86 | East Carolina | -0.3 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 85 | 8-5 | -3.9 | |||||||
| 87 | Maryland | -0.6 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 60 | 4-8 | -4.0 | |||||||
| 88 | Cent. Michigan | 0.2 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 100 | 7-6 | -4.0 | |||||||
| 89 | Temple | -1.1 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 55 | 4-7 | -4.1 | |||||||
| 90 | South Florida | -0.3 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 65 | 3-9 | -4.1 | |||||||
| 91 | Houston | 0.2 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 100 | 5-7 | -4.2 | |||||||
| 92 | Boston College | -0.5 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 55 | 2-10 | -4.2 | |||||||
| 93 | Marshall | 0.1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 100 | 5-7 | -4.3 | |||||||
| 94 | Buffalo | 0.0 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 90 | 4-8 | -4.3 | |||||||
| 95 | West. Michigan | 0.2 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 100 | 4-8 | -4.4 | |||||||
| 96 | Colorado State | -0.1 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 90 | 4-8 | -4.4 | |||||||
| 97 | Wake Forest | -1.4 | 4.4 | 5.8 | 55 | 5-7 | -4.5 | |||||||
| 98 | Troy | -0.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 100 | 5-7 | -4.5 | |||||||
| 99 | Rice | -1.1 | 5.4 | 6.5 | 75 | 7-6 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 100 | UTSA | -0.2 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 120 | 8-4 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 101 | North Texas | -0.6 | 5.5 | 6.1 | 80 | 4-8 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 102 | UTEP | -0.7 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 70 | 3-9 | -4.6 | |||||||
| 103 | Fl. Int'l FIU | -0.2 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 90 | 3-9 | -4.7 | |||||||
| 104 | Illinois | -1.3 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 55 | 2-10 | -4.9 | |||||||
| 105 | Kansas | -1.8 | 5.0 | 6.8 | 50 | 1-11 | -5.0 | |||||||
| 106 | Wyoming | -0.7 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 90 | 4-8 | -5.0 | |||||||
| 107 | Texas State | -0.6 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 95 | 4-8 | -5.0 | |||||||
| 108 | Memphis | -0.4 | 5.0 | 5.4 | 100 | 4-8 | -5.0 | |||||||
| 109 | Army | -1.0 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 70 | 2-10 | -5.1 | |||||||
| 110 | East. Michigan | -1.4 | 5.3 | 6.7 | 55 | 2-10 | -5.1 | |||||||
| 111 | Miami (Ohio) | -0.8 | 5.5 | 6.3 | 85 | 4-8 | -5.1 | |||||||
| 112 | Hawaii | -1.1 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 75 | 3-9 | -5.1 | |||||||
| 113 | UNLV | -0.8 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 75 | 2-11 | -5.2 | |||||||
| 114 | Florida Atlantic | -1.1 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 80 | 3-9 | -5.4 | |||||||
| 115 | New Mexico | -1.1 | 5.7 | 6.8 | 120 | 4-9 | -5.5 | |||||||
| 116 | Tulane | -1.7 | 4.7 | 6.4 | 60 | 2-10 | -5.5 | |||||||
| 117 | UAB |
-0.6
| 5.6 |
6.2
|
105
|
3-9
|
-5.5
| |||||||
| 118 | South Alabama | -1.0 | 4.6 | 5.6 | 80 | 2-11 | -5.6 | |||||||
| 119 | Idaho | -1.9 | 4.7 | 6.6 | 55 | 1-11 | -5.7 | |||||||
| 120 | Colorado | -2.7 | 4.4 | 7.1 | 50 | 1-11 | -5.9 | |||||||
| 121 | Akron | -0.6 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 105 | 1-11 | -5.9 | |||||||
| 122 | New Mexico St. | -1.6 | 5.1 | 6.7 |
90
|
1-11
| -6.5 | |||||||
| 123 | Southern Miss | -1.2 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 80 | 0-12 | -6.0 | |||||||
| 124 | Massachusetts | -2.5 | 3.9 | 6.4 | 70 | 1-11 | -6.8 |

No comments:
Post a Comment